GunsCourt Smacks Down Part of NY's ‘Sensitive Places’ Carry...

Court Smacks Down Part of NY’s ‘Sensitive Places’ Carry Ban

-


Estimated reading time: 3 minutes

Second Amendment Foundation just picked up another major courtroom win against New York’s post-Bruen carry restrictions. And one of the state’s most controversial anti-carry rules is officially staying down.

In a new ruling tied to Christian v. James, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit affirmed a lower court injunction blocking New York’s so-called “Vampire Rule,” which effectively banned lawful concealed carry on nearly all private property open to the public unless owners posted explicit permission signs.

In other words, the default was “no carry” almost everywhere.

Gun rights groups argued the law was an obvious workaround to the Supreme Court’s landmark New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. Bruen ruling after New York was forced to start issuing carry permits under constitutional standards.

And the court appears to have agreed.

“New York’s carry ban on private property open to the public – essentially all private businesses – was intended as the state’s next novel circumvention of the Second Amendment,” said SAF Senior Director of Legal Operations Bill Sack. “We are thrilled the Second Circuit saw through this ruse and tossed the ban out on its rear end.”

The lawsuit was brought by SAF alongside Firearms Policy Coalition and plaintiff Brett Christian. But the ruling wasn’t a total sweep.

The court also upheld New York’s ban on carrying firearms in parks, rejecting SAF’s arguments that the restriction also violates the Second Amendment. According to SAF, at least one judge issued a notable dissent on that portion of the opinion.

That means the fight over what counts as a legitimate “sensitive place” is far from over.

Since Bruen dropped in 2022, anti-gun states like New York, California, New Jersey, and others have tried to redraw massive portions of public life into gun-free zones, often using broad “sensitive places” language to restrict where permit holders can legally carry.

Critics say the strategy was never about safety as much as making carry permits functionally useless.

SAF founder Alan Gottlieb made it clear the organization isn’t done pushing back.

“The ideologues who think they can create ‘sensitive places’ to ban the legal carry of firearms should understand that SAF will continue to fight for the right to keep and bear arms for all Americans,” Gottlieb said.

For New York gun owners, today’s ruling means one thing is now crystal clear: the state can’t simply wave a wand and declare almost every privately-owned business off limits to lawful carry holders.

At least not without a fight.

*** Buy and Sell on GunsAmerica! ***

Available on GunsAmerica Now

https://gunsamerica.com/listings/search



Source link

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Latest news

Michigan Bills Would Erase the State Felony for Suppressors and Short-Barreled Rifles After Federal Court Gutted NFA Registration

Key Takeaways Two Michigan House Republicans introduced bills to repeal state prohibitions on short-barreled rifles, short-barreled shotguns, and suppressors. The...

M10 Booker: Not Your Daddy’s Light Tank

By Mason Berryman Posted in #History For more than a century, infantry units have fought under an unforgiving reality: When you’re...

Virginia FFLs Put the ARs Back on the Shelf. The Statute Blocking Them Is Still on the Books.

Key Takeaways Virginia gun shops sell rifles and magazines that were expected to be banned on July 1, due...

Report: D.C. Court Overturns Gun Conviction, Holding That Carrying a Firearm Is Not Automatically Suspicious

Key Takeaways A D.C. court overturned a gun conviction, establishing that carrying a firearm isn’t automatically suspicious. This ruling is...

New Mexico Argued a Federal Judge Did Not Have to Follow the Appeals Court. He Blocked the State’s Gun Waiting Period Anyway

Key Takeaways A federal judge ruled against New Mexico’s gun waiting period law in Ortega v. Grisham, allowing two...

Boebert’s Freedom to Ship Act Would Repeal the Handgun Mailing Ban and Fine Carriers $10,000 Every Time They Block a Lawful Gun Shipment

Key Takeaways Rep. Lauren Boebert introduced HR 9979, the Freedom to Ship Act, to protect lawful firearm shipments and...

Must read

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you