Historians and legal scholars are presently debating the historical scope of the right to bear arms. One of the most prominent participants in this debate, Professor Saul Cornell, has a recent post on the Originalism Blog criticizing my work. But his post does not respond to most of the objections that I have raised against his arguments, so I wanted to explain where I see the debate in the hope that we can move it forward.
For my full post, please see The Originalism Blog.
