Case Name
Case Number
On Appeal From
Issue
Status
McCowan v. United States
CA5
Challenge to 922(g)(1) – federal felon-in-possession ban
Pending – Filed 2/3/26
Johnson v. United States
CA4
Challenge to 922(g)(1) – federal felon-in-possession ban
Pending – Filed 1/28/26
(Docketed 2/6)
United States v. Mitchell
CA5
Challenge to 922(g)(1) – federal felon-in-possession ban
Pending – Filed 2/5/26
Williams v. United States
CA2
Challenge to 922(g)(1) – federal felon-in-possession ban
Pending – Filed 2/4/26
Reed v. United States
CA11
Challenge to 922(g)(1) – federal felon-in-possession ban
Pending – Filed 2/3/26
Hunter v. S.F.
Court of Appeal of California, Second Appellate District
Whether California’s practice of automatically and prolongedly
disarming individuals subject to non-violent restraining orders violates the Second Amendment (as applied to the States via the Fourteenth Amendment) when, as in Petitioner’s case, there was no finding of any credible threat of physical harm and no history of violence, thus depriving an innocent person of the core right to keep and bear arms for self-defense for five years without proper constitutional guardrails.
Pending – Filed 10/10/25, docketed 2/11/26
Alexis v. United States
CA5
Challenge to 922(g)(1) – federal felon-in-possession ban
Pending – Filed 2/5/26
Delgado v. United States
CA2
Challenge to 922(g)(1) – federal felon-in-possession ban
Pending
Morgan v. United States
CA5
Challenge to 922(g)(1) – federal felon-in-possession ban
Pending
England v. United States
CA4
(1) Whether the “in common use for lawful purposes” measure for applying Second Amendment protections to certain firearms is determined as part of Bruen’s step one textual/conduct analysis, or Bruen’s step two historical analysis?
(2) Whether 26 U.S.C. § 5861(d), part of the National Firearms Act, violates the Second Amendment as applied to England’s possessing an unregistered short-barreled shotgun, where England introduced uncontradicted evidence proving that firearm is no more dangerous and unusual than comparable unregulated non-NFA weapons in common use for lawful purposes?
(3) Whether the individual right to keep and bear arms guaranteed by the Second Amendment applies only to “law-abiding citizens” who have no prior convictions?
Pending
Aramboles v. United States
CA2
Challenge to 922(g)(1) – federal felon-in-possession ban
Pending
Heaggeans v. United States
CA4
Challenge to 922(g)(1) – federal felon-in-possession ban
Pending
Garner v. United States
CA5
Challenge to 922(g)(1) – federal felon-in-possession ban
Pending
Schoenthal v. Raoul
25-541
CA7
Whether Illinois’ flat ban on ordinary citizens carrying firearms on public transportation violates the Second and Fourteenth Amendments.
Pending, Respondents’ brief due 2/17/26
Viramontes v. Cook County, Ill.
CA7
Whether the Second and Fourteenth Amend-
ments guarantee the right to possess AR-15 platform
and similar semiautomatic rifles.
Pending, Relisted for conference 2/20/26
National Association for Gun Rights v. Lamont
CA2
Whether a ban on the possession of AR-15-style rifles and firearm magazines with a capacity in excess of ten rounds—both of which are possessed by millions of law-abiding Americans for lawful purposes—violates the
Second Amendment.
Pending, Relisted for conference 2/20/26
Duncan v. Bonta
CA9
1. Whether a ban on the possession of exceedingly common ammunition feeding devices violates the Second Amendment.
2. Whether a law dispossessing citizens, without compensation, of property that they lawfully acquired and long possessed without incident violates the
Takings Clause
Pending, Relisted for conference 2/20/26
Gator’s Custom Guns Inc. v. Washington
Supreme Court of Washington
Whether ammunition feeding devices with the capacity to hold more than ten rounds are “Arms”
presumptively entitled to constitutional protection under the plain text of the Second Amendment.
Pending, Relisted for conference 2/20/26
Paris v. Second Amendment Foundation
CA3
Do firearms laws imposing a minimum age of 21 violate the purported Second Amendment rights of 18-to-20-year-olds?
Pending – no movement since November 2025
McCoy v. ATF
CA4
Whether federal laws banning 18-to-20-year-olds from purchasing handguns from federally licensed firearm dealers violates the Second Amendment’s guarantee of the right to keep arms
Pending – no movement since November 2025
