DefenseArgument Over Vape Leaves Two Dead in South Carolina...

Argument Over Vape Leaves Two Dead in South Carolina After the Second Victim Returned Fire

-


A dispute over a vaping device in Edgemoor, South Carolina turned fatal on August 20, 2026, leaving two people dead. Brandon Tavon Cassidy shot the first victim multiple times, and a second victim returned fire in self-defense, sustaining gunshot wounds before Cassidy died of his injuries.

The Chester County Sheriff’s Office has not released the victims’ identities, the second victim’s current condition, or details about how those involved knew one another. No charges have been announced, and the investigation remains active.

Estimated reading time: 2 minutes

EDGEMOOR, SC — An argument over a vaping device ended with two people dead in the early morning hours of August 20, 2026, after a second person struck by gunfire shot back, according to the Chester County Sheriff’s Office.

Investigators say the shooting happened in the area of Mays Drive in the Edgemoor community. In an update posted by the sheriff’s office, investigators said they have determined the shooting occurred because of an altercation over a vaping device.

According to the sheriff’s office, Brandon Tavon Cassidy shot the first victim multiple times with a handgun. That victim died of their injuries.

A second victim returned fire. The exchange left both that person and Cassidy with gunshot wounds. Cassidy died of his injuries.

The sheriff’s office says the second victim returned fire in self-defense.

I cannot make sense of a handgun coming out over a vaping device. What I can say is that when someone decided a vape was worth shooting a person over, the second victim was not defenseless.

More from USA Carry:

A great deal has not been released. Neither victim has been identified by the sheriff’s office. The condition of the second victim has not been announced beyond the fact that the person was struck. Investigators have not said how the people involved knew one another, who started the altercation, or what time the call came in. No charging decision has been announced, and in South Carolina that call belongs to the solicitor’s office, not to investigators.

The sheriff’s office says this remains an active investigation.



Source link

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Latest news

First Look: Springfield Armory Kuna Tri-Lug

By Will Dabbs, MD Posted in #Guns Editor’s Note: This Springfield Armory Kuna Tri-Lug article is based on the hands on...

Louisiana State Police Tried to Pull the Justice Department Into a Concealed Carry Lawsuit. The Judge Said No, and the Case Stays Pointed at...

Key Takeaways A federal judge denied Louisiana State Police Superintendent Frank Besson’s request to involve the U.S. attorney general...

Springfield Armory Kuna Review: Is This Roller-Delayed 9mm PDW Worth It?

Editor’s Note: This Springfield Armory Kuna review was originally published in June 2025 and has been updated for...

Ruger, Smith & Wesson and Glock All Told a Court the Same Thing About California’s Microstamping Rule

Key Takeaways The National Institute of Standards and Technology informed Congress that there is no reliable evidence supporting microstamping...

Somali Piracy Resurges as Merchant Crews Remain Disarmed

“Somali pirates hijacked an oil products tanker off Yemen, a Somali maritime security official said, the latest in...

SCOTUS Gun Watch 8/24/2026 | Duke Center for Firearms Law

Pending Petitions Case Name Case Number On Appeal From Issue Status Jund v. United States 26-5369 CA9 Whether 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1), which permanently bars firearm...

Must read

Springfield Armory Kuna Review: Is This Roller-Delayed 9mm PDW Worth It?

Editor’s Note: This Springfield Armory Kuna review was...

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you