The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention now cites estimates of 500,000 to 2.5 million defensive gun uses each year, correcting its public discussion of armed self-defense after gun-control activists successfully pushed the agency to remove the figures in 2022.
The correction replaces the previously published lower estimate of 60,000. It follows the restoration of the defensive gun use estimates earlier this year, which AmmoLand covered in August.
For gun owners, the history behind that change matters. One of the people who wanted the numbers removed was Gun Violence Archive executive director Mark Bryant, who complained that gun-rights advocates used the research to stop gun-control legislation from passing.
What the CDC Changed
The CDC’s firearm injury and death webpage attributes its current range to the 2013 National Academies report, Priorities for Research to Reduce the Threat of Firearm-Related Violence. A footnote acknowledges that the page was updated to reflect the report’s discussion of defensive gun use.
These are estimates from existing research, rather than findings from a new CDC survey. The agency explains that results differ depending on survey questions, populations, timeframes, and study design.
In an October 5 article, the Crime Prevention Research Center welcomed the correction. CPRC argues that the earlier lower figure inadequately reflected problems with National Crime Victimization Survey estimates.
The CDC Corrects its Post on Defensive Gun Uses
The Trump administration restored the post as it originally appeared before the CDC removed it and has now corrected an error in the original version.
https://t.co/AhFvHNuxJZ
#2a #guns #dgu #guncontrol— John R Lott Jr. (@JohnRLottJr) October 5, 2026
The National Academies report, on pages 15–16, recognizes armed self-defense as common, citing national survey estimates ranging from roughly 500,000 to more than 3 million defensive gun uses annually. That is substantial evidence of Americans using firearms to protect themselves against criminals.
The report also flags a critical weakness in the much lower NCVS-based estimate of 108,000 annual defensive uses: respondents were not specifically asked about defensive gun use, making that figure difficult to interpret.
Gun-control advocates cannot honestly treat a survey that never specifically asked about armed self-defense as the final word on how often it occurs. The report’s warning belongs alongside that lower estimate whenever it is cited.
GVA Wanted the Numbers Gone
The political pressure is documented in emails reported by The Reload in December 2022.
Bryant joined GVPedia’s Devin Hughes and Newtown Action Alliance’s Po Murray in a September 2021 meeting with CDC officials. Their campaign targeted the agency’s presentation of defensive gun use research, particularly the high-end estimate associated with criminologist Gary Kleck.
Bryant requested removal of an estimate that “has been used so often to stop legislation.” He also complained that the research had stalled gun-control policy.
The CDC subsequently removed the numerical range and research link in 2022. GVA participated in the lobbying campaign; federal officials made the decision.
The emails also show that CDC officials initially defended the webpage’s wording. They recognized that GVA’s documented incidents represented only a limited portion of defensive gun uses, including because some incidents never reach official sources.
AmmoLand Has Already Exposed GVA’s Anti-Gun Agenda
Lee William’s 2021 investigation of the Gun Violence Archive examined its expansive mass-shooting definition, reliance on media and law-enforcement reports, and Bryant’s public support for gun restrictions.
GVA’s definition counts incidents involving four or more victims shot, including wounded survivors, and can include gang, drug, and domestic violence. That produces a category broader than the indiscriminate public attacks many readers picture when they hear “mass shooting.”
Bryant also endorsed restrictions on standard-capacity magazines, dismissing 30-round magazines and 60-round drums as hobby equipment outside the Second Amendment.
William’s June 2024 follow-up challenged the media’s use of GVA figures for sensational headlines and documented a lawmaker using one such story to promote an “assault weapon” ban.
That record gives gun owners ample reason to reject the pretense that Bryant’s intervention at the CDC was detached from gun-control politics.
Armed Self-Defense Belongs in the Public Record
The CDC’s correction does not establish an exact annual count or mean every defensive gun use saved a life. It does restore a fuller account of research on Americans using firearms for protection.
Government agencies should not bury that evidence because it makes gun bans harder to sell.
The Second Amendment protects the right to keep and bear arms. That right does not depend on Gun Violence Archive’s bogus research or whether armed self-defense complicates the next gun-control campaign.
Shall not be infringed has no statistical threshold.
About Duncan Johnson:
Duncan Johnson is a lifelong firearms enthusiast and unwavering defender of the Second Amendment—where “shall not be infringed” means exactly what it says. A graduate of George Mason University, he enjoys competing in local USPSA and multi-gun competitions whenever he’s not covering the latest in gun rights and firearm policy. Duncan is a regular contributor and editor-in-chief for AmmoLand News and is responsible for AmmoLand’s daily gun-rights reporting and industry coverage.
