GunsGun Owners Should Be 'Ashamed'

Gun Owners Should Be ‘Ashamed’

-


Estimated reading time: 2 minutes

The mayor of Grand Rapids, David LaGrand, just said the quiet part out loud.

“I think if you’ve got a gun, you should be ashamed of yourself. I really do,” LaGrand said during a public discussion, comparing gun ownership to smoking and arguing communities should start “having some shaming around gun possession.”

He doubled down, acknowledging the Second Amendment exists.

“I get that we got a Second Amendment” — but insisting gun owners should still feel shame because, in his view, guns are “for killing human beings,” not everyday tasks like gardening or changing a tire.

That didn’t sit well with Colion Noir.

In a fiery response, Noir called the mayor’s comments “childish” and disconnected from reality.

“You don’t own a gun to change a tire,” Noir said. “You own a gun for the worst day of your life.”

Noir argued that shaming won’t touch criminals, only law-abiding citizens. “You know who shame works on? Law-abiding people. That’s it,” he said. “So you’re not talking to criminals. You’re talking to fathers. Mothers. People who just want to protect themselves.”

LaGrand compared gun ownership to cigarette use, saying he sees “so much more harm done than benefit.” Noir dismissed that analogy outright.

“Smoking provides literally no benefit. None,” Noir said. “Self-defense does. Protecting your kids does. Protecting your wife does.”

He also pointed out what he views as a contradiction: elected officials speaking against private gun ownership while being protected by armed security and police.

“It’s okay for guns when they protect you, but shameful when they protect me?” Noir asked.

The broader argument centers on preparedness versus pacifism. Noir framed gun ownership as a response to real-world violence, asking whether shaming people for preparing for self-defense makes communities safer or just more vulnerable.

LaGrand’s comments raise a larger question for gun owners in Michigan and beyond: Is moral condemnation a serious public safety strategy, or is it simply politics?

And more pointedly, if owning a firearm for lawful self-defense is something to be ashamed of, who exactly benefits from that shame?

*** Buy and Sell on GunsAmerica! ***

Available on GunsAmerica Now

https://gunsamerica.com/listings/search



Source link

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Latest news

Armed citizen saved school kids

An armed citizen saved school children in Oregon when he saw a man violently break into his children’s...

DOJ Civil Rights Chief Harmeet Dhillon, Who Created the Division’s First Second Amendment Section, Resigns After Midterms

Key Takeaways Harmeet Dhillon resigned as Assistant Attorney General for Civil Rights at the U.S. Department of Justice in...

Holosun DRS-NV $699.99 Deal – Night Vision 8x Zoom Red Dot

Limited Time Deal Most night vision options either cost a small fortune or...

SCOTUS Gun Watch 10/19/2026 | Duke Center for Firearms Law

Pending Petitions Case Name Case Number On Appeal From Issue Status Mendoza-Garcia v. United States 26-5860 CA5 Can Congress criminalize intrastate possession of a firearm solely...

23 Days After an Iowa State Student Sued, Ames Drops Its CyRide Bus Gun Ban and Tells Drivers Carrying Is Not a Threat

Key Takeaways The Ames Transit Agency Board of Trustees approved a revised weapons policy on November 5, allowing firearms...

Beretta Model 84 BB .380 ACP Pistol, Police Trade in — $279.99

Very Limited Inventory! Italian-made surplus Berettas under $300 are the kind of deal...

Must read

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you