Estimated reading time: 3 minutes
New York just took a step back. Not by choice, but by court order.
In a move that’s being called a major legal victory, Gun Owners of America (GOA) and the Gun Owners Foundation (GOF) forced the state to abandon one of the more controversial pieces of its post-Bruen gun control scheme: the social media background check for concealed carry permits.
Yeah… that one.
The requirement that law-abiding citizens hand over three years of their social media history just to exercise a constitutional right. That provision is now dead in the water.
According to the settlement in Antonyuk v. James, New York officials have agreed to a permanent injunction blocking enforcement of the rule. That means no more fishing expeditions through your Instagram, Facebook, or whatever you said about politics three summers ago.
And it gets better.
The New York State Police are now required to scrub that requirement from the official carry permit application entirely. No vague wording. No backdoor requests. It’s out. Gone.
As GOA’s Erich Pratt put it, the entire Concealed Carry Improvement Act has always been less about “improving” anything and more about making it harder for regular people to carry.
Hard to argue with that when the state was literally asking for your tweets as part of the process.
GOF’s John Velleco didn’t mince words either, calling the requirement a “blatant invasion of privacy” and pointing out the obvious. Your right to self-defense doesn’t come with a requirement to hand over your digital life.
And that’s really the bigger picture here. This wasn’t just a Second Amendment issue. It was a First Amendment issue. A Fourth Amendment issue. And frankly, a common-sense issue.
Because once the government gets comfortable digging through your speech to decide whether you’re “worthy” of a right… where does that stop?
Today it’s gun permits. Tomorrow it’s… what, exactly? The courts didn’t seem interested in finding out. Now, before anyone starts celebrating like this whole thing is over. It’s not.
This lawsuit is still very much alive, and GOA is continuing to go after other parts of New York’s carry law, including the ever-expanding list of “sensitive locations” where carrying is banned.
We’re talking parks, zoos, and places that serve alcohol. Basically, the kind of places people actually go.
So yeah, this is a win. A real one. But it’s one battle in a much bigger fight over what “shall not be infringed” actually means in 2026. For now, though, New York got checked.
And for once, the state had to admit, at least on this issue, it pushed too far.
*** Buy and Sell on GunsAmerica! ***
Available on GunsAmerica Now
is a seasoned outdoorsman, lifelong hunter, and the kind of guy who’d rather track whitetails than scroll social media. As an editor for GunsAmerica, he’s got a sharp eye for spotting both solid gear and bad gun laws. Whether he’s deep in the woods or deep in editorial deadlines, Larry brings a no-nonsense, tell-it-like-it-is approach to firearms, hunting, and the great American tradition of self-reliance. If there’s a hot debate on gun rights or the latest in hunting tech, you can bet Larry’s got an opinion—and it’s probably backed up with both facts and field experience.
Experience:
– Licensed Bowhunter, Hunter, and Trapper – Experienced in ethical hunting and wildlife conservation.
– Concealed Carry Permit Holder (NYS & AZ) – Trained and licensed to carry in multiple states.
– 2A Journalist – Covering firearms legislation, Second Amendment issues, and gun rights for over a decade.
– Emergency Medical Technician (EMT) – Certified to provide emergency medical care in the field.
– Field-Tested Gear Reviewer – Hands-on experience with firearms, optics, and hunting tech.
