Notice: Function wp_get_loading_optimization_attributes was called incorrectly. An image should not be lazy-loaded and marked as high priority at the same time. Please see Debugging in WordPress for more information. (This message was added in version 6.3.0.) in /home/nationalgunowner/public_html/thegunpeople.com/wp-includes/functions.php on line 6170
GunsVirginia's Assault Weapons Bills Head Back to Governor's Desk...

Virginia’s Assault Weapons Bills Head Back to Governor’s Desk Without Modification

-


AR-15 Rifle
Governor Abigail Spanberger’s recommended changes to SB 749 and HB 217 may widen the reach of Virginia’s pending ban on many commonly owned semi-automatic firearms and magazines over 15 rounds. Image Duncan Johnson

The Virginia General Assembly passed both SB 749 and HB 217 earlier this year. The identical bills would ban the future transfer, sale, and manufacture of many commonly owned semi-automatic firearms classified as “assault firearms,” along with standard-capacity magazines holding more than 15 rounds. These restrictions would not apply to firearms or magazines lawfully owned before the July 1, 2026, effective date.

The bills reached Governor Abigail Spanberger’s desk, but the former CIA agent returned them to the legislature with recommended amendments. The General Assembly is now considering whether to accept or reject those changes. If lawmakers reject the amendments, they can still allow the original bills to pass by taking no further action.

Governor Spanberger’s recommendation would make an already constitutionally questionable bill significantly more restrictive. Specifically, it would remove the word “fixed” from the definition of an assault firearm.

Under the original language, a semi-automatic centerfire rifle or pistol with a fixed magazine capable of holding more than 15 rounds would be banned for transfer. The governor’s change would broaden the ban to cover many more semi-automatic firearms that accept detachable magazines exceeding 15 rounds, effectively restricting a wider range of commonly owned handguns and rifles and further limiting their lawful carry in public.

With the bills now “passed by” in their amended form, they will return to the Governor’s desk.

Spanberger can sign them into law, veto them, or take no action, allowing them to become law automatically after 30 days. Most believe that a veto is almost guaranteed not to happen, meaning that these bills will become law.

Many legal observers view this process as a potential stall tactic designed to shorten the window for legal challenges before the laws take effect on July 1, 2026. Organizations including Gun Owners of America (GOA), the Virginia Citizens Defense League (VCDL), and the Firearms Policy Coalition (FPC) have vowed to file lawsuits immediately upon enactment. Because suits cannot be brought until the bills are officially signed or become law without signature, the delay reduces the time available for courts to issue injunctions against the new laws.

Legal challenges are expected in both federal and state courts.

Virginia’s Constitution provides robust protection for the right to keep and bear arms through Article I, Section 13, which explicitly states that the right belongs to the people and is not limited to military service. The provision, strongly influenced by George Mason, reflects the founders’ deep concerns about tyranny and standing armies.

Article I, Section 13 of the Virginia Constitution reads: “That a well regulated militia, composed of the body of the people, trained to arms, is the proper, natural, and safe defense of a free state, therefore, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed; that standing armies, in time of peace, should be avoided as dangerous to liberty; and that in all cases the military should be under strict subordination to, and governed by, the civil power.”

Whether or not the amendments were accepted by the Virginia General Assembly doesn’t mean the battle is over. The core fight over these bills continues.

Virginia has served as ground zero for the national gun-rights debate in recent years, and this latest round of legislation ensures the battle will intensify in the months and years ahead.

Virginia Redistricting Vote and Spanberger Gun Bans Fuel 2A Backlash


About John Crump

Mr. Crump is an NRA instructor and a constitutional activist. John has written about firearms, interviewed people from all walks of life, and on the Constitution. John lives in Northern Virginia with his wife and sons, follow him on X at @right2bear, or at www.crumpy.com.

John Crump






Source link

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Latest news

Brent Metz Convicted in Colorado Shooting Case

Estimated reading time: 3 minutes Earlier this month, a Colorado jury convicted a gun owner...

White Sox Added to CCRKBA’s ‘Don’t Feed Them’ List

Estimated reading time: 2 minutes The Chicago White Sox have landed on the Citizens Committee...

The Long Work That Wins The Short Fight » Concealed Carry Inc

The defender in our determined-mindset piece won his fight in two seconds. He had to. The carjacker gave him...

Florida Gun Owner Jailed 14 Days After NICS False Denial

Estimated reading time: 3 minutes Imagine being arrested, jailed, and forced onto an ankle monitor....

PMC Bronze .223 Rem 55gr FMJ BT 1,000 Rounds – $441.27 w/ Code

Limited Time Deal If you’ve been waiting to stock up on affordable .223 for training and range days, this...

Virginia Claims State Constitution Does Not Protect Individual Gun Rights in Crump v. Katz

Virginia gun owners are getting a clear look at how far the Commonwealth is willing to go to...

Must read

Brent Metz Convicted in Colorado Shooting Case

Estimated reading time: 3 minutes...

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you